<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Geek Style &#187; Cisco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/tag/cisco/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog</link>
	<description>UNIX, InfoSec, Networking</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 09:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tony Li and Procket</title>
		<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/276</link>
		<comments>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/276#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babak Farrokhi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TCP/IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farrokhi.net/wordpress/?p=276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://tony.li/">Tony Li</a> has <a href="http://news.com.com/Procket+loses+star+engineer/2100-1033_3-5178211.html" title="Procket loses star engineer">left Procket</a> a while ago. He was a former employee of Cisco Systems and Juniper Networks before joining Procket in 1999. Currently he is working at Verio, <em>playing ISP</em> as <a href="http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg05362.html" title="Re: Cisco Systems to Purchase Procket Networks...">he says</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://news.com.com/2008-1035_3-5236759.html" title="Routing's rock star">his latest interview with CNet News.com</a>, he gave some insight into new trends he sees in the IP routing market and the Internet in general.</p>
<blockquote><p>I would much rather be in a start-up than a large company. My style is much more about getting things done, and I prefer the freedom rather than the many layers of process that are usually necessary in a big company.</p></blockquote>
<p>(this is what I and Tony Li have in common <img src='http://farrokhi.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
<p>Remember rumors about Procket and Cisco? Now its <a href="http://newsroom.cisco.com/dlls/2004/corp_061704.html?CMP=ILC-001">official</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/276/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cisco, Juniper and Procket</title>
		<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/273</link>
		<comments>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/273#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babak Farrokhi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TCP/IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juniper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farrokhi.net/wordpress/?p=273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>What Juniper is doing?</b></p>
<p>After completing the <a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2004/0209juniscreen.html" title="NWFusion: Juniper acquires NetScreen">acquisition of NetScreen</a>, Juniper is ready to make the next big moves. First of them is <a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0608pepsi.html" title="NWFusion: Juniper ready to pop Pepsi">introduction of J Series of low-end routers</a> (codenamed Pepsi). And the next important move (which is not confirmed by juniper yet) is <a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2004/0607juniper.html" title="NWFusion: Industry awaits Juniper's next enterprise move">acqusition</a> of <a href="http://www.extremenetworks.com/">Extreme Networks</a>.</p>
<p>This would be very important for Cisco Systems, since Juniper was only a competitor in high-end routers market, but after recent acqusitions and new products, they will enter the low-end router market as well as switching area.</p>
<p><b>And what about Cisco?</b></p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://www.cisco.com/">Cisco Systems</a> is not sitting aside. Cisco is also trying to beat Juniper is high-end routing market by <a href="http://www.cisco.com/offer/lp_hfr.html" title="Cisco Carrier Routing System">releasing</a> the brand new <a href="http://www.cisco.com/go/crs">CRS-1</a> (up to 92 Tbps. enough for your network?) which is a revolution from Cisco. CRS-1 is not based on <a href="http://www.cisco.com/go/ios">old school IOS software</a>, but on brand-new shiny <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps5763/products_qanda_item09186a008022e09b.shtml">Cisco IOS XR</a> operating system. IOS XR itself <a href="http://www.qnxzone.com/node/view/131">is based on</a> <a href="http://www.qnx.com/">QNX RTOS</a>.</p>
<p>And at last, <em>&#8220;Cisco is acquiring certain assets and intellectual property from router start-up <a href="http://www.procket.com/">Procket Networks</a> for about $80 million&#8221;</em>, according to <a href="http://www.nwfusion.com/edge/news/2004/0610procket.html" title="Cisco to buy Procket assets">NWFusion article</a>. I was not lucky enough to have a Procket router, but I should admit their <a href="http://www.procket.com/products.shtml">products</a> look very good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/273/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say goodbye to Nachi</title>
		<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/110</link>
		<comments>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/110#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2003 15:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babak Farrokhi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[InfoSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nachi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farrokhi.net/wordpress/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Worms are hot topic of day. <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.blaster.e.worm.html">Blaster</a> and <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.welchia.worm.html">Nachi</a> are making trouble for ISPs as well as end users worldwide.<br />
There are diffrent ways to combat  these worms. If you are a network administrator utilizing <a href="http://www.cisco.com/">Cisco</a> gear in your network, you can reduce the effect of these worms using some simple tricks. I have already posted an <a href="http://farrokhi.net/blog/000158.html" title="Blaster's Blast">article</a> on blocking Blaster worm in a cisco router. <br />But blocking Nachi is a little bit tricky since it uses ICMP echo/reply to map your network and propagate its code. This will cause a heavy ICMP storm in your netowork (that you may have already noticed). The most simple way is blocking all ICMP traffic which is not a good solution and harms your customers (They won&#8217;t be able to do PING measurement in this case).</p>
<p>Here is what I did to protect against Nachi (in a Cisco router):</p>
<p>Setup your <code>NULL0</code> interface like this:</p>
<pre>!
interface Null0
no ip unreachables
!</pre>
<p>Then make an <code>access-list</code> that matches ICMP echo/reply packets:</p>
<pre>!
ip access-list extended nachi-list
permit icmp any any echo
permit icmp any any echo-reply
!</pre>
<p>Now the trick:</p>
<pre>!
route-map nachi permit 10
match ip address nachi-list
match length 92 92
set interface Null0
!</pre>
<p>Fortunately, Nachi uses fixed size ICMP packets (92 bytes, including IP header) as reachability probe. Above <code>route-map</code> will forward all ICMP packets with size of 92 bytes to <code>Null0</code> interface. <code>Null0</code> will not return any unreachable code and just drops the packet.</p>
<p>You should put this <code>route-map</code> on your network interface, like this (necessary parts listed only):</p>
<pre>!
interface FastEthernet0/0
description Connected to Local Network
ip route-cache policy
ip policy route-map nachi
!</pre>
<p>That &#8220;<code>ip route-cache policy</code>&#8221; is very important because it asks the router to cache all policy-route information in order to reduce processor load. (CEF won&#8217;t be useful here).</p>
<p>This is the result after 5 minutes:</p>
<pre>router#sh route-map nachi
route-map nachi, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): nachi-list
length 92 92
Set clauses:
interface Null0
Policy routing matches: 190909 packets, 20236354 bytes</pre>
<p>
Congratulations! Your network is saved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/110/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Impact of the MS SQL worm</title>
		<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/107</link>
		<comments>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/107#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babak Farrokhi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farrokhi.net/wordpress/?p=107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bgpexpert.com/" title="BGPExpert.com">Iljitsch van Beijnum</a>, author of my favorite book <a href="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/bgp/index.html?CMP=IL7015" title="Building Reliable Networks with the Border Gateway Protocol">BGP</a>, explains his experience with <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2003/01/28/msworm.html" title="Network Impact of the MS SQL Worm">MS SQL worm and its effect on Cisco routers</a> on Oreilly Network&#8217;s <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/">ONLamp.com</a>.</p>
<p>Almost the same thing happened to me last week which caused complete crash on our edge router. We were running CEF but it didn&#8217;t help. After getting into router through serial console and shutting down all interfaces I found that there is sort of malformed traffic is passing through our edge router headed to internet from our local network. I didn&#8217;t even had chance to do traffic inspection on the router itself, since once I was trying to bring up the FastEthernet interface, the cpu usage on the router hits the max. So I got into the Catalyst switch and checked all connected interfaces for abnormal traffic pattern, and I found it! It was an infected MS SQL host inside our network.</p>
<p>Folks, please keep your windows box <a href="http://www.windowsupdate.com/" title="windowsupdate.com">up to date</a>. This is serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/107/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blaster&#8217;s blast</title>
		<link>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/98</link>
		<comments>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/98#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2003 21:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Babak Farrokhi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cisco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[worm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://farrokhi.net/wordpress/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.blaster.worm.html">Blaster worm </a> is <a href="http://www.securityfocus.com/news/6708">discovering</a> vulnerable windows machines as fast as possible, I did what I had to do very long time ago, and it was blocking NetBios in our network border:</p>
<pre>edge#show access-list forbid
Extended IP access list forbid
deny tcp any any range 135 139 (8588631 matches)
deny udp any any range 135 netbios-ss (425993 matches)
deny tcp any any eq 4444 (45 matches)
deny udp any any eq tftp (4 matches)
permit ip any any (24505712 matches)
</pre>
<p>Oops! too many netbios requests for just two hours! And this is how we blocked all Blaster&#8217;s junk traffic in our network. A filter like the one shown above has been applied to borders, and done. In one case it just dropped more than 6mbps on a link. It&#8217;s horrible.</p>
<p>Enable <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/default.asp?url=/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/hnw_enable_firewall.asp">internet connection firewall</a> if you are using XP, and get this <a href="http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/w32.blaster.worm.removal.tool.html">tool</a> to check your system health and remove the worm if your workstation is infected. And then update your windows with all <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/security/security_bulletins/ms03-026.asp">security patches</a> available on Microsoft <a href="http://www.windowsupdate.com/">Window Update</a> website. </p>
<p>Definite solution: Get <a href="http://www.freebsd.org/">FreeBSD</a> and set your computer free! (Geeks Only)</p>
<p>Resolution: We don&#8217;t need NetBios, We don&#8217;t like Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://farrokhi.net/blog/index.php/archives/98/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

